Tactical Wisdom
Politics • News • Preparedness
A community of preparedness people, with a biblical foundation. We discuss preparedness advice, my books, and current events.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
Sad Ham Fuddery

I wanted to share some radio antics from yesterday because there is some learning value in it.

While I was rucking 2.5 miles, I carried my new Motorola XPR 6550 to see how it performed in a wooded area. I was listening to the local GMRS repeaters, which have been taken over completely by sad hams. After a rousing round-robin discussion of where to eat dinner and critiques of various restaurant French fries, they began a discussion of some radio ne'er do wells (more like vagabonds) that needed to be tracked down.

The ringleader complained that some "truckers" (turns out they are maintenance guys) had been using their frequency and activating the repeater (GASP). Mind you, this is an Open repeater that anyone can use. Well, our hero said he hadn't' had the time to track them down yet, but he was going to get to it, because someone needed to find them and tell them that they are using the repeater illegally.

Let me clarify, that's completely FALSE. As it is an open repeater, with a published PL Tone, it is open for anyone to use. Now, he might try and say you can't use the radio for business use, but that's a HAM radio thing, not a GMRS thing. It is perfectly legal to use GMRS for business communications.

Now, I get it, they probably don't have a GMRS license, but that doesn't make this illegal. Every FRS (license free) radio has the exact same 22 channels as GMRS on it. Many, like Cobra radios, are sold as 2-watt business radios, but they have the same channels. As a side note, 3 of the GMRS channels used to be "Itinerant Business" channels, meaning that if a business has had their radios for a long time, these channels are likely on them.

What I think the deal is that these guys are using some cheap FRS radios, but they are really close to the repeater. They put a CTCSS code on the channel to stop having to hear every kid in the neighborhood playing on their walkie talkies, and by pure coincidence got the code to their repeater (they are all from the same tone list).

If these guys track them down, what gives them the authority to act as self-appointed Junior Federal Agents and go knock on this business's door? The problem is that a lot of amateur radio guys think that their license conveys some sort of authority, it doesn't. So, let's say they track these guys down, confront them, and these cats tell the Ham Junior Police to pound sand, what is their recourse? The hams could call the cops, who would politely tell them that they have no idea what they are talking about, but that they had better not trespass and accost people anymore, lest someone blacken their eye.

They could try to go to the FCC, but the FCC would point out that in order for them to take action, the activity has to be malicious and intentional. Listening to these guys on the radio, they have NO IDEA whatsoever that they are interfering with this repeater. Therefore, there is no violation. The right solution is simply to change the tone to your repeater.

As far as businesses using GMRS without a license, or using FRS radios above 2 watts, there are literally THOUSANDS of them doing it every day. The FCC will never act on it, since business use is permissible and not a violation. Sure, they are using more power than legally allowed, but since we're talking 4 watts instead of 2, the FCC could care less.

One of the comments the ham guy said proved that they don't ever operate radios for business. He said that the other guys didn't know that you should never use a PL tone (privacy code) on simplex (talking without a repeater). That's pure BS. I've used GMRS radios all over the country (and in other ones) on simplex for running security details or surveillance, and if you don't use a PL tone, you will hear every little business or kid using the radio as a toy. Yes, using a PL tone on simplex is a good idea if you and your team want to just talk to each other.

Yes, I know everyone else can hear our conversation, but I'm not hearing kids shouting "poo poo pee pee" over the channel or Suzie asking Diane for price check.

Anyway, use PL tones on simplex to reduce interference and also understand that even with a GMRS license, you aren't given exclusive access to any of the 22 channels. You just have to deal with the fact that other humans exist and might exercise their right to use the same channel you are exercising your rights on.

Y'all would be proud of me, it took every ounce of willpower in my body, but I did not engage with these guys.

Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
BattlBox Mission 134 Unboxing

Here's my unboxing of BattlBox Mission 134: Every Day Carry. I highly recommned BattlBox.

Link to BattlBox: https://classic.avantlink.com/click.php?tool_type=ml&merchant_link_id=18d5f0dc-a5d5-4617-8d89-3672fa873181&website_id=b54d42a2-3e73-4f03-ac0d-a3e7b99eed53

00:14:14
Hoplite M10 Review

My video review of the Hoplite M10 Reusable Flashbang. It's a great tool available at: https://www.hoplitegear.com/product-page/m10-havoc

00:06:46
Timeline Cleanse

Time for a timeline Cleanse before WW3 kicks off.

00:00:10
INTEL BRIEF - SAUDI ARABIA

The Houthis have struck the port of Yanbu again. Last time they hit the Aramco facility, this time they hit the port itself.

INTEL BRIEF - RED SEA

An Ambrey Maritime On Board Security Team repelled a pirate boarding attempt off the coast of Yemen last night. A small boat with at least 7 pirates aboard pulled alongside and began a boarding attempt when the security team fired warning shots. The pirates remembered that they had urgent business elsewhere once they realized the ship had armed personnel aboard.

INTEL BRIEF - NETHERLANDS

20 different locations along rail lines had large pipes placed on them to make the system believe the tracks were blocked, causing major disruptions.

post photo preview
On Resistance to Evil by Force Study
Chapter 17 - On the Relationship of People in Good & Evil

Ilyin first describes our moral obligation to first attempt through conversation to change someone's evil will.  After that, we can then morally resist their evil deeds.  Our requirement to live together in harmony requires to try and stop evil deeds while they are still just thoughts, to permanently change someone's will.

He points out that we are the worst judges of ourselves.  We all keep and inner and outer self; one reserved for ourselves and one that is public-facing.  We all self-delude ourselves into believing that we are always the good guy and that we have no faults.  We get mad when we are "unfairly blamed", when actually being called out for our bad behavior.

Ilyin describes nonverbal communication well.  Every act or attitude we take is physically manifested within us and becomes part of our outward appearance, whether for good or bad, if peolpe just take time to notice.  He calls it "unconscious integrity of communication and transmission".  

According to Ilyin, you cannot be "evil inside" or "good inside", and not have it affecrt teh outside world.  If you have evil inside, you spread evil around you.  If you are good inside, you spread good to all those you touch. "A good man is a living hearth of good & strength in good, while an evil man is a living hearth of evil, strength in evil and weakness in good."  

We have a duty to resist evil interally within us.

Ilyin says that we are OBLIGATED to resist evil everywhere for the good of all.  He says we are obliged to fight evil at every turn and that we have no right at all to allow evil to go unchecked.  We MUST act against and not let it mutliply.  He claims this is a spiritual call and a public duty. 

He says there is no right to commit evil.  Those who are naive enough to believe that others have a freedom to commit evil will eventually become slaves to it.

After describing this, he points out again that we all have a public duty for the good of all to actively resist evil anywhere.  We obligated to resist evildoers and villains as well as to resist proactively and effectively. 

"Anyone who sends evil must always be cognizant of this and accept that others will be permitted to put a stop to his wicked acts and force him to qualitatively review the evil he sends"

That quote was the basis for law and safety in the old west - before I attack someone, I have to decide if I'm willing to get shot for it.  We need to RETVRN.

Ilyin says that as a society, we all have a desire to see good grow.  Evil people threaten that and threaten our peace, so we must unite against villains in our midst.  Those villains must be met by united resistance and opposition.  Ilyin points out that the resistance to evil is done by few on beahlf of all and benefits a community as a whole.

In the book, Ilyin points out that for any central authority, whether state or church, to exist, it must be supported by the people for the good of the whole, with submitting to it for the good of all.  He believed that the reason that Russia turned communist was because the people desired to submit to the state for the good of themsleves (taking from the rich and giving it to the individual).  The US Constitution as originally written met Ilyin's requirements.  Notably, the church's "Military Orders" or knights, also did.  When governments failed to protect citizens, the church did, and the citizens willingly submitted to the local order.

He points out something here that illustrates our current issues.  He said that as soon as a government begins to appease the villains or the people harbor them, society falls.  That's exactly where we are today.

Let me know your thoughts below.

 

 

 

Read full Article
post photo preview
On Resistance to Evil by Force Study
Chapter 16 - On the Modification of Love

Ilyin starts out by defining what most people consider to be love "What is nice is good", or that which we are sympathetic to.  He points out that perfection is actually what is good and worthy of love.  He posits that people like things that give them pleasure and confuse that for love, but it is shallow and unmeaningful.

On the contrary, spiritual love means that we do what is right, even if it is not pleasant, not fun, and not nice, even if it leads to discomfort, unpleasantness, or difficulty.  For spiritual love, even suffering is worth it.

According to Ilyin, Christ's two basic Commandments were to love God and to love your neighbor.  He points out that when your neighbor (fellow man) is doing evil, resisting him would seem to be in contradiction to "loving" him, but not resisting violates the love of God.  The love of God (doing what is right in His eyes) outweighs any sympathy or "love" for your neighbor.  If someone has removed God from their lives, they need us to tell them "no", rather than modern society telling them "yes", and thus resistance to evil.

The proponents of "love wins" and "love trumps all", claim that condemning people for their choices and evil deeds is labeled as "hate", "intolerance", and "malice", and thus encourage no limits on behavior.  If I truly love my neighbor, I MUST be able to tell him no, that his behavior is unacceptable, and that I will resist their actions.  Refusing to put them on the right path out of "love" is not truly love and is actually helping to condemn their soul.  Ilyin interestingly paraphrases the idea that "acceptance is not a Christian Virtue".

Ilyin reminds us that while we should indeed love our neighbor, we CANNOT EVER love evil in a man.  There are some people who are just evil.  No amount of acceptance or sympathy will ever change them, and we must modify our approach to resistance.

The only thing we can truly love completely without conditions is God.

When true good is confronted by true evil, evil must be destroyed and, as Ilyin says, executed.  When we resist using force, we do not become evil, as, in the end, we pray for the salvation of the soul of the executed person.

Ilyin points out that we begin with disapproval and work our way through a series of escalating responses to evil done in our presence, which can (and should) include ruthlessness against evildoers.  Remember God's commands to Joshua about what to do to anyone who resisted him.  Ilyin posits that true love of good requires it.

He uses the example of Jesus driving the money changers from the Temple as the justification for righteous application of force in the presence of and resistance to evil.

Ilyin says that resistance to evil can be summed up like this: "the struggle is fought with love, but with spiritualized love."

We must resist evil out of a love for good, not for vengeance, revenge, greed, or desire for power.

The struggle against evil is done from love.

Here's the closing quote, which I love: "but the active resistance against the villain's evil designs on others, and against the villain himself is not evil, but good."

Let me know your thoughts below.

Read full Article
post photo preview
On Resistance to Evil By Force Study
Chapter 15: On the Limits of Love

Man, this chapter is FULL of good stuff, despite it being relatively short.

Spiritual Love and devotion is a CHOICE.  It's not born into us, we have to decide to choose good over evil and prefer it.  According to Ilyin, you cannot love everything (as the left says) or love all things equally.  Those who say they do are either incorrect or are so self-centered that they don't actually love anything but themselves.

According to the text, we love everyone to the extent that they do good.  Love of evil, evil people, or the devil is UNNATURAL.

Ilyin writes that we must NEVER accept evil.  Accepting evil, or identifying with it, leads to temptation and eventual submission.

According to our homeboy Ilyin, the only position Christians can take when faced with evil is with a drawn sword.

Next, Ilyin DESTROYS one of the biggest fallacies that the modern church pushes on us: "Love your enemies" refers only to your own personal haters & persecutors, NOT the enemies of God.  BOOM.  Christ never called us to love the enemies of God.  Christ Himself actually had fiery words and threats of retribution for evildoers.  Therefore, loving, forgiving, and caring for the enemies of God is against God's will.

When the Bible says to "forgive", it says to forgive those who sin AGAINST YOU, not God.  The Bible refers to forgiving "brothers" or fellow followers of The Way, not everyone.  In fact, it even points out that if a brother refuses to change, you can treat him as a heathen.  According to Ivan, those who can "forgive all" have a personal worldview, rather than a spiritual one.

According to Ilyin, forgiveness doesn't stop evil, it just stops the emotional impact it has on you.  The villain is still free to impact others.  Forgiveness doesn't mean we shouldn't intervene.

Indifference towards evil done to others shows a lack of will and spirit.

There is a great quote here: "Permissiveness has nothing to do with Christian forgiveness."

When we resist, we must not do so to punish, but to restrain behavior.  

To the villain, forgiveness is encouragement to continue.

Ilyin asks: Do we have to let the victim be harmed by the villain to show our gentleness and restraint?  He points out that this is a betayal.

Straight FIRE chapter.  Discuss below.

Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals